Investigation notes.
What I found interesting about the language used was:
- Most of the candidates
     have brief or approximately 2 second pauses, this could shows that the
     candidates, being the losing team are nervous, so the seconds can
     represent them thinking about what they can say to keep their place within
     the competition. For example :
 
‘I lost money (2) but the reason I lost money’ – The candidate here
is trying to justify his point but uses the 2 second pause to think carefully
about what to say, to keep his place in the competition.
- Alan sugar uses a lot of
     repetition within his speech to maintain authority. For Example:
 
‘ coulda’ – I think Alan uses this this device to reinforce the
problem and help the candidate to understand that they didn’t achieve, which is
why he goes on to say: ‘But you didn’t’ 
- Alan sugar has the all
     power as the candidates always approach him as: ‘Sir Alan’ rather than just Alan.
 - The female uses a Face
     saving strategy, in order to help her stay in the competition, For
     Example: ‘Sir Alan may I say one
     more thing please’- she asks in a polite way in order to be liked and
     kept in the show, whereas if she spoken to him rudely she most likely
     wouldn’t have been able to speak and say what she wanted to say, which
     resulted in her staying in the competition.
 -   Alan uses a lot of Dramatic pauses, to
     show power. By doing this he keeps the candidates on edge not getting too
     comfortable because they don’t know which one of them is going to go. For
     example: ‘get out that door (3)’
     ‘(4) if you insist’ 
 - At first Lord Sugar says ‘could of’ which is interrupted by
     the male, so Alan repeats his statement with more emphasis on the word, he
     again is interrupted. He then adds, other words ‘coulda(.) shoulda (.) woulda’ All with emphasis, to show to the
     candidates that he is the one with the power and from that moment, none of
     the candidates talk interrupt Lord Sugar.
 - Even though Alan holds all
     the power in the Boardroom, after he tells the female candidate to leave
     the room, he is very complimentary towards male 1. ‘) Simon (.) if I ask you to build me a wall (.) you’d build me a
     wall (.) I’m pretty sure of it (.) if I asked you to dig me a trench (.) I
     think your dig me a trench (.)’- This shows a contrast of language,
     from how Alan was speaking throughout the whole of the conversation (especially
     towards the female) to how he spoke to Simon at the end.  
 
Theories that could be used:
Language and power theories: Face
saving strategies etc.
Language and Gender (to some
extent)
Other data to collect: 
You could compare this data with
how Alan Sugar talks differently depending on the sex of the Boardroom; For
Example: All male Boardrooms/ All female Boardrooms. 
Could also compare how in an
all-female Boardroom and an all-male Boardroom interact with each other and to
Alan Sugar.
Possible data Investigation
title:
‘The differences how the powerful participant interacts depending on
the sex of the Boardroom’
‘How does the powerful participant enforce power in the Boardroom?’
Other investigation
collection:
-         
Go to an actual Boardroom and record yourself
the conversation.
-         
TV 
-         
Radio
No comments:
Post a Comment